Association of occupational sitting with cardiovascular outcomes and cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review with a sex-sensitive/gender-sensitive perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Sedentary behaviour is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular health. Although long periods of sedentary behaviour take place at work, evidence of the relationship between such occupational sitting and cardiometabolic health risks remains limited. This systematic review aimed to update the evidence on the associations of occupational sitting with cardiovascular outcomes and cardiometabolic risk factors based on longitudinal studies. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: Workplace. POPULATION: Employees aged 18-65 years. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were cardiovascular diseases and cardiometabolic risk markers. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. DATA SOURCES: Ten databases, including PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL (search January 2018, updated February 2019). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were screened, extracted and appraised by three independent reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Studies were markedly heterogeneous in terms of measurement of occupational sitting, cardiometabolic risk factors and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, so that standards were hardly identifiable and limiting the value of the evidence. The review included 27 high or acceptable quality publications. Of the eight high-quality publications from seven cohorts, three cohort studies found significant associations of occupational sitting with primary outcomes. Additionally, one study described an association with the secondary outcome. Another high-quality publication found an association between occupational sitting and ischaemic heart disease in a subgroup already at risk due to hypertension. For sex/gender analysis, 11 of the 27 high and acceptable quality publications reported sex-stratified results. Five of these found sex differences. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence regarding the association of occupational sitting with cardiometabolic health risks was limited because of the lack of standardised measurements for occupational sitting. Occupational sitting combined with an overall sedentary lifestyle was associated with an elevated relative risk for several cardiometabolic outcomes. There is an urgent need for standardised measurements of occupational sitting to facilitate meta-analysis. Sex/gender aspects of this relationship require further investigation.

Predictors for continued participation of employees in structured outpatient obesity intervention programmes.

BACKGROUND: Overweight, obesity and the conditions resulting from them have become one of the major challenges for health systems all over the world. High dropout rates are particularly common among the participants in outpatient obesity intervention programmes (OIP). Limited research has examined retention in OIP. METHODS: Based on the data of a 24-month Bundeswehr outpatient OIP with a total of 630 participants, predisposing factors (n = 30) for continued participation beyond an early stage (0-3 months) and beyond a later stage (0-6 months) were analysed by means of a logistic regression analysis. In order to correct for multiple-comparison, the p-value was adjusted (p* < 0.0017). RESULTS: Three hundred out of 630 participants continued to participate beyond an early stage and 205 beyond a later stage. Besides an age between 40 and 50 at the beginning of the outpatient OIP, it was possible to show that knowledge of one's blood pressure and a positive lifestyle prior to participation in the programme (higher level of sporting activity) were predisposing factors for early dropout (>3 months) in the intervention programme. DISCUSSION: The possible predisposing factors examined accounted for about 35% of the variance in a rough estimate. In order to improve long-term participation in workplace outpatient OIP, the study focused on how the motivation of older people and employees with an unfavourable cardiovascular risk profile could be improved.

Introducing occupational health management in the German Armed Forces.

Holistic approaches to workplace health promotion (WHP) within the military setting are challenging. In 2015, the German Ministry of Defense initiated a 6-month pilot study of WHP in the Federal Armed Forces. The pilot study was to identify organizational challenges that should be addressed before the Ministry implemented a comprehensive occupational health management policy in all departments. Eleven diverse departments were selected to participate in a WHP program that addressed physical activity, diet, stress management and addiction prevention. As part of the evaluation concept, we interviewed coordinators, and department heads focusing on transfer factors from the perspective of the implementers. All coordinators and their department heads or deputies participated in semi-structured face-to-face on-site interviews. The data were analyzed based on qualitative content analysis. The coordinators (officers with sports science degree) seemed fully prepared and capable to master the new task. They experienced difficulties in adapting WHP activities to local structures and needs, and complications in administering modular activities. Department heads described conflict regarding human resources between the military mission and the implementation of WHP. Commitment to WHP was a strong facilitator. The interviews identified various barriers related to support by middle management (supervisors) and specific work conditions (e.g. shift work). If occupational health management is to be successfully implemented on a large scale, conceptional and practically collaboration is necessary between WHP and occupational safety and health, and organization and leadership, respectively. Supervisors will benefit from open communication about compensation for the release time of their subordinates to attend WHP.